Al Viro <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 12:28:22AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > Andrew told me already today that Jeff[1] had sent a patch fixing all that. To
> > prevent the leaks he's calling sx_release_io_range(bp) in every check before
> > exiting sx_probe so this seems correct. A small question though: After calling
> > sx_request_io_range() in the if-statement on line 499 is it ok to call
> > sx_request_io_range() for a second time in a row on line 587? I think in
> > this case the second call has to go, no?
> >
> > [1]rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/misc-2.6.git
>
> Huh? I don't see any specialix patches in that repository right now...
http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg399680.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |