Takahiro-san wrote:
> but the cpu controller code will add some if statements
>From what I read, I suspect that the more interesting question
will be how many additional cache lines and memory pages are
touched, on the most common paths through the scheduler.
However, guessing about performance is a risky business.
Benchmarks will be most helpful for a significant scheduler
patch such as this one.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] SUBCPUSETS: a resource control functionality using CPUSETS
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] SUBCPUSETS: a resource control functionality using CPUSETS
- From: Hirokazu Takahashi <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] SUBCPUSETS: a resource control functionality using CPUSETS
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] SUBCPUSETS: a resource control functionality using CPUSETS
- From: Hirokazu Takahashi <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] SUBCPUSETS: a resource control functionality using CPUSETS
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 1/3] CPUMETER: add cpumeter framework to the CPUSETS
- From: KUROSAWA Takahiro <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] CPUMETER: add cpumeter framework to the CPUSETS
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] CPUMETER: add cpumeter framework to the CPUSETS
- From: KUROSAWA Takahiro <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] SUBCPUSETS: a resource control functionality using CPUSETS
- Prev by Date: [PATCH][Fix][Resend] Fix Bug #4959: Page tables corrupted during resume on x86-64 (take 3)
- Next by Date: Re: I request inclusion of SAS Transport Layer and AIC-94xx into the kernel
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] cpuset read past eof memory leak fix
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/5] SUBCPUSETS: a resource control functionality using CPUSETS
- Index(es):
