Bob Picco wrote:
> > - if (arg & (arg - 1)) {
> > + if (arg < 1 || (arg & (arg - 1))) {
>
> Well it seems like what you want is:
>
> if (!arg || (arg & (arg - 1))) {
Yes, it's the same. Here's the new patch:
Disallow setting an interrupt frequency of zero (which would result in
a division by zero), and disallow enabling the interrupt when the
frequency hasn't yet been set (which would use an interrupt period of
zero).
Signed-off-by: Clemens Ladisch <[email protected]>
--- linux-2.6.13.orig/drivers/char/hpet.c 2005-09-22 10:56:23.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.13/drivers/char/hpet.c 2005-09-25 19:02:02.000000000 +0200
@@ -365,6 +365,9 @@ static int hpet_ioctl_ieon(struct hpet_d
hpet = devp->hd_hpet;
hpetp = devp->hd_hpets;
+ if (!devp->hd_ireqfreq)
+ return -EIO;
+
v = readq(&timer->hpet_config);
spin_lock_irq(&hpet_lock);
@@ -517,7 +520,7 @@ hpet_ioctl_common(struct hpet_dev *devp,
break;
}
- if (arg & (arg - 1)) {
+ if (!arg || (arg & (arg - 1))) {
err = -EINVAL;
break;
}
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
|
|