Luben Tuikov wrote:
Instead of you _waiting_ and thus do nothing, you can
move out of the way, or listen and accept _technical_ advice.
This is unfortunate. History shows us that being
inflexible to new ideas (or technologies) becomes
one's undoing.
I wonder if SCSI Core could be Linux's undoing? Could this
and reiser4, and OBDs (yet another new SCSI technology in the
making), show us how inflexible Linux has become?
Now its SAS and reiser4. When OBDs come out full force it
will be the block layer, then who knows whatelse...
Is Linux going to be just as obstinate?
Why has Linux become like this?
Luben,
The fact that your responses are constantly filled with non-technical
paranoia does not help the inclusion of aic94xx at all.
Maybe you need to write your driver as a block driver, and completely
skip the SCSI core, if it bothers you so much? That would get everybody
else out of the loop, and free you to write the driver as you see fit.
As it stands now, you're making an end run around the SCSI core, rather
than fixing it up. SCSI needs to be modified for SAS, not just
complained about.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |