Nick wrote: > this code looks much neater than the code I reviewed. This does not surprise me. Takahiro-san writes nice code. I will abstain from picking one cpu controller over another, as that is not an area of my expertise. But I definitely agree with your hope: > to have just a single CPU resource controller -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] SUBCPUSETS: a resource control functionality using CPUSETS
- From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] SUBCPUSETS: a resource control functionality using CPUSETS
- From: Hirokazu Takahashi <taka@valinux.co.jp>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] SUBCPUSETS: a resource control functionality using CPUSETS
- From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] SUBCPUSETS: a resource control functionality using CPUSETS
- From: Hirokazu Takahashi <taka@valinux.co.jp>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] SUBCPUSETS: a resource control functionality using CPUSETS
- From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
- [PATCH 1/3] CPUMETER: add cpumeter framework to the CPUSETS
- From: KUROSAWA Takahiro <kurosawa@valinux.co.jp>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] CPUMETER: add cpumeter framework to the CPUSETS
- From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] CPUMETER: add cpumeter framework to the CPUSETS
- From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] SUBCPUSETS: a resource control functionality using CPUSETS
- Prev by Date: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Framework for automatic Configuration of a Kernel
- Next by Date: Re: I request inclusion of SAS Transport Layer and AIC-94xx into the kernel
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] CPUMETER: add cpumeter framework to the CPUSETS
- Next by thread: Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [PATCH 1/3] CPUMETER: add cpumeter framework to the CPUSETS
- Index(es):
