Re: [PATCH] umask in POSIX message queues

On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Krzysztof Benedyczak wrote:
> 
> After rereading it I think that the better place for the line setting
> umask is do_create() function as it will be on the same level as
> open_namei(). I hope this change will clarify things.
> 
> If this make sense I'll send a patch.

Yes, that makes more sense.

Please do send a tested patch,

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] umask in POSIX message queues
    • From: Krzysztof Benedyczak <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] umask in POSIX message queues
    • From: Krzysztof Benedyczak <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] umask in POSIX message queues
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] umask in POSIX message queues
    • From: Krzysztof Benedyczak <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [spi-devel-general] Re: SPI
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] m32r: set CHECKFLAGS properly
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] umask in POSIX message queues
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] umask in POSIX message queues
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]