Grant Grundler writes: > Yeah, my preference would be PCI_MSI only depend on Local APIC. > (Note that having a Local APIC implies having an IO APIC as well Not true. Lots of systems have a local APIC but no I/O APICs. However, having an I/O APIC pretty much implies having a local APIC. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] MSI interrupts: disallow when no LAPIC/IOAPIC support
- From: Grant Grundler <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] MSI interrupts: disallow when no LAPIC/IOAPIC support
- References:
- [PATCH] MSI interrupts: disallow when no LAPIC/IOAPIC support
- From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] MSI interrupts: disallow when no LAPIC/IOAPIC support
- From: Grant Grundler <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] MSI interrupts: disallow when no LAPIC/IOAPIC support
- From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] MSI interrupts: disallow when no LAPIC/IOAPIC support
- From: Grant Grundler <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] MSI interrupts: disallow when no LAPIC/IOAPIC support
- Prev by Date: Re: watchdog with P4SCI and 2.6.9 (Supermicro)
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH] pci_ids.h: cleanup: whitespace and remove unused entries
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] MSI interrupts: disallow when no LAPIC/IOAPIC support
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] MSI interrupts: disallow when no LAPIC/IOAPIC support
- Index(es):
