On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 09:37:59AM +0800, Luke Yang wrote:
> We really don't have plan about Blackfin with a MMU now. So do you
> beleve it is necessary to change the name to arch/blackfin?
Hmm, as far as I know there are at least plans for variants with memory
protection units (but without virtual addressing), but anyway - why put
the mmu into the architecture name? If you use "blackfin" you are open
to everything and no non dsp guru has to guess what bf might be ;)
Robert
--
Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
Hannoversche Str. 2, 31134 Hildesheim, Germany
Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-9
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |