Re: [spi-devel-general] Re: SPI

[Vitaly Wool <vwool@ru.mvista.com>]

My POV is that those lines should go away.

Best regards,
  Vitaly

Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:

> On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 15:12:14 +0400, dmitry pervushin said:
>  
>
> > Hello guys,
> >
> > I am attaching the next incarnation of SPI core; feel free to comment it.
> >    
>  
>
> > +/* The devfs code is contributed by Philipp Matthias Hahn 
> > +   <pmhahn@titan.lahn.de> */
> >    
>  
>
> > +/* devfs code corrected to support automatic device addition/deletion
> > +   by Vitaly Wool <vwool@ru.mvista.com> (C) 2004 MontaVista Software, Inc. 
> > + */
> >    
> I'd like to thank Vitaly and Philipp for their work, which was probably useful
> at the time, but I've always wondered - when cleaning up code, should such comments
> be removed too, or left as historical reminders?  The MAINTAINERS file seems
> to get cleaned most of the time, the CREDITS doesn't - which way should
> in-source comments go?
>
>  
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/