Hi Zwane,
Great news, thanks! I will start testing it, pretty sure I can arrange
MSI devices, too.
As for your comment about vector allocation policy - allocation on the
node where device resides does sound logical to me...
Regards,
--Natalie
> On Sun, 25 Sep 2005, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
>
> > Apologies for the long periods between updates, i've been
> doing some
> > relocating.
> >
> > Changes since last post:
> >
> > * Current interrupt handling domain is still on a node
> basis, although
> > i have moved over to dynamically allocated per cpu IDTs.
>
> One thing i have to fix here is alignment of cpu_idt_table,
> since the per cpu allocator can't guarantee much in that regard.
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |