Re: Aw: Re: 2.6.14-rc2-ge484585e: kexec into same kernel: irq 11 nobody cared; but ehci_hcd should

On Saturday 24 September 2005 17:12, [email protected] wrote:
> Correct.
> The interrupt happens before the interrupt is enabled by the ehci driver. the question is why is the interrupt already enabled? or: who forgot to disable the interrupt?

Correct question is "who forgot to set ehci->regs->intr_enable before request_irq'ing?"

IOW: writel (INTR_MASK, &ehci->regs->intr_enable); /* Turn On Interrupts */
needs to be moved so that it happens before request_irq. 
--
vda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: 2.6.14-rc2-ge484585e: kexec into same kernel: irq 11 nobody cared; but ehci_hcd should
    • From: Denis Vlasenko <[email protected]>
  • 2.6.14-rc2-ge484585e: kexec into same kernel: irq 11 nobody cared; but ehci_hcd should
    • From: [email protected]
  • Aw: Re: 2.6.14-rc2-ge484585e: kexec into same kernel: irq 11 nobody cared; but ehci_hcd should
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] mm/msync.c cleanup
• Next by Date: Re: [patch] sys_epoll_wait() timeout saga ...
• Previous by thread: Aw: Re: 2.6.14-rc2-ge484585e: kexec into same kernel: irq 11 nobody cared; but ehci_hcd should
• Next by thread: [PATCH] fix de_thread vs it_real_fn() deadlock
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]