> > > > Well yes. But I don't think anybody is using it, and if so they are
> > > > clearly breaking the rules in man open(2):
> > >
> > > Be liberal in what you accept and all such... Everything else aside,
> > > why bother?
> >
> > To conform to well defined semantics?
>
> Well-defined is not exactly the word I'd use for that mess (example -
> we still have the last remnant of ancient BSD idiocy in there; the last
> case when dangling symlink is still traversed upon object creation,
> everything else had been fixed since then).
>
> And O_DIRECTORY is not the only flag that acquires or loses meaning
> depending on O_CREAT - consider e.g. O_EXCL. It's a mess, of course,
> but this mess is part of userland ABI. We tried to fix symlink idiocy,
> BTW, on the assumption that nothing would be relying on it. Didn't
> work...
OK, I'm convinced.
Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |