Re: [PATCH] reduce sizeof(struct file)

On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 01:30:21AM +0200, J.A. Magallon wrote:
> How about anonymous unions ? gcc-3.3.3 and above support them.
> Is 2.6 supposed to be built with 2.95 ?

NAK.  For one thing, yes, it is supposed to be built with 2.95.  For
another, they do not buy you anything - few enough places use either
field, so there is no point in hiding that union.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • RE: How to Force PIO mode on sata promise (Linux 2.6.10)
    • From: "David Sanchez" <[email protected]>
  • Re: How to Force PIO mode on sata promise (Linux 2.6.10)
    • From: Clemens Koller <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH] reduce sizeof(struct file)
    • From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] reduce sizeof(struct file)
    • From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] reduce sizeof(struct file)
    • From: "J.A. Magallon" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] POSIX timers SMP race condition
• Next by Date: Re: init and zap low address mappings on demand for cpu hotplug
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] reduce sizeof(struct file)
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] reduce sizeof(struct file)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]