Re: PTRACE_SYSEMU numbering

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 09:46:38PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> The fix is easy, IMHO, and not even urgent. It suffices to move PTRACE_SYSEMU 
> def from <linux/ptrace.h> to <asm-i386/ptrace.h>, and we didn't do that yet 
> for laziness only. There's no architecture that I know of, apart i386, which 
> implements SYSEMU (except maybe s390, but that isn't public).

Please either renumber it to something above 0x4200, or make it i386
private.  If you intend for other architectures to implement it in the
future, renumbering it would be better.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux