Re: [patch 0/6] mm: alloc_percpu and bigrefs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrew Morton a écrit :
> Eric Dumazet <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Please (re)consider this patch since it really reduce CPU load and/or memory
>> bus trafic between CPUS.
>
>
> Did you actually measure this?   If so, you should publish the results.
>
>

Hi Andrew

Well yes I did.

Here is part of the mail sent on netdev one month ago :



Hi David

I played and I have very good results with the following patches.

# tc -s -d qdisc show dev eth0 ; sleep 10 ; tc -s -d qdisc show dev eth0
qdisc pfifo_fast 0: bands 3 priomap  1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Sent 440173135511 bytes 3211378293 pkt (dropped 240817, overlimits 0 requeues 27028035)
 backlog 0b 0p requeues 27028035
qdisc pfifo_fast 0: bands 3 priomap  1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Sent 440216655667 bytes 3211730812 pkt (dropped 240904, overlimits 0 requeues 27031668)
 backlog 0b 0p requeues 27031668

(So about 360 requeues per second, much better than before (12000 / second))

oprofile results give
0.6257  %    qdisc_restart  (instead of 2.6452 %)


thread is archived here :

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=112521684415443&w=2

Thank you

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux