Petr Vandrovec <[email protected]> wrote: > > Andrew Morton wrote: > > Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, Christoph Lameter wrote: > >> > >> > Hmm. This likely has something to do with debugging code. I was unable to > >> > reproduce this on amd64 with your config. I get another failure with > >> > 2.6.14-rc2 on ia64 if I enable all the debugging features that you have. > >> > The system works fine if no debugging is configured: > >> > > >> > kernel BUG at kernel/workqueue.c:541! > >> > swapper[1]: bugcheck! 0 [1] > >> > >> I fixed the above issue (a structure became larger than the maximum > >> allowed by the slab allocator) and the kernel boots fine now on an 8 way > >> ia64. Cannot reproduce the problem. > > > > > > Petr can. I think we're still waiting for him to test the below (please): > > Sorry, I've missed that half of email completely. Yes, it seems to fix problem, > box has currently 8 min uptime, which is 7:55 more than it survived before. Great, thanks. Christoph, was that patch the final official version? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6.14-rc1-git-now still dying in mm/slab - this time line 1849
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.14-rc1-git-now still dying in mm/slab - this time line 1849
- References:
- 2.6.14-rc1-git-now still dying in mm/slab - this time line 1849
- From: Petr Vandrovec <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.14-rc1-git-now still dying in mm/slab - this time line 1849
- From: Petr Vandrovec <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.14-rc1-git-now still dying in mm/slab - this time line 1849
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.14-rc1-git-now still dying in mm/slab - this time line 1849
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.14-rc1-git-now still dying in mm/slab - this time line 1849
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.14-rc1-git-now still dying in mm/slab - this time line 1849
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.14-rc1-git-now still dying in mm/slab - this time line 1849
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.14-rc1-git-now still dying in mm/slab - this time line 1849
- From: Petr Vandrovec <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.14-rc1-git-now still dying in mm/slab - this time line 1849
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.14-rc1-git-now still dying in mm/slab - this time line 1849
- From: Petr Vandrovec <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.14-rc1-git-now still dying in mm/slab - this time line 1849
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.14-rc1-git-now still dying in mm/slab - this time line 1849
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.14-rc1-git-now still dying in mm/slab - this time line 1849
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.14-rc1-git-now still dying in mm/slab - this time line 1849
- From: Petr Vandrovec <[email protected]>
- 2.6.14-rc1-git-now still dying in mm/slab - this time line 1849
- Prev by Date: Re: tty update speed regression (was: 2.6.14-rc2-mm1)
- Next by Date: Re: dentry_cache using up all my zone normal memory -- also seen on 2.6.14-rc2
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.14-rc1-git-now still dying in mm/slab - this time line 1849
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.14-rc1-git-now still dying in mm/slab - this time line 1849
- Index(es):