Re: [PATCH 3/3] Gdt page isolation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Andi Kleen <[email protected]> wrote:

> >  	 * This grunge runs the startup process for
> >  	 * the targeted processor.
> >  	 */
> > +	cpu_gdt_descr[cpu].address = __get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_ZERO);
> 
> I can see why don't check it for NULL, but it's a ugly reason and 
> would be better fixed. It at least needs a comment.

it's so early in the bootup that any failure here would probably be 
fatal anyway. But yeah, a comment would be nice.

> -Andi (who would still prefer just going back to the array in head.S - 
> would work as well and waste less memory)

that doesnt really solve the problem for e.g. Xen, which needs a 
separate page for each GDT. (xenolinux is a separate arch right now, but 
it will/should be merged back into its base architectures) So why not 
solve all the problems at once?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux