Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 08/10] uml: Fix GFP_ flags usage

On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 07:29:21PM +0200, Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso wrote:
> -	if(atomic) flags |= GFP_ATOMIC;
> +	if (atomic)
> +		flags = GFP_ATOMIC;

We should take a careful look at where this is called from, and see if we
can get rid of the atomic business altogether.

				Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/10] "Bigger" UML fixes for 2.6.14
    • From: Blaisorblade <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 08/10] uml: Fix GFP_ flags usage
    • From: "Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: dentry_cache using up all my zone normal memory -- also seen on 2.6.14-rc2
• Next by Date: [PATCH 1/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 08/10] uml: Fix GFP_ flags usage
• Next by thread: [PATCH 02/10] strlcat: use for uml umid.c
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]