Re: [PATCH] NTP shift_right cleanup (v. A3)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ulrich Windl wrote:


Hi,

I'm against "signed shift right", because the reason for the macro is exaclty that CPUs do a "signed" shift right. John does a "signum(arg) * right_shift(abs(arg), number_of_positions)". So maybe it's the signed_unsigned_shift_right(), susr() to be cryptic ;-)


I see, so that would be a divide by 2^shift?

Well, nevermind - I guess the patch is better than what was
there before.

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com -
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux