Re: [PATCH] NTP shift_right cleanup (v. A3)

[Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>]

Ulrich Windl wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm against "signed shift right", because the reason for the macro is exaclty that 
> CPUs do a "signed" shift right. John does a "signum(arg) * right_shift(abs(arg), 
> number_of_positions)". So maybe it's the signed_unsigned_shift_right(), susr() to 
> be cryptic ;-)
I see, so that would be a divide by 2^shift?

Well, nevermind - I guess the patch is better than what was
there before.

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/