Re: [PATCH] v9fs-get-sb-cleanup.patch

On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 02:35:06AM +0100, Al Viro said:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 09:25:26PM -0400, Latchesar Ionkov wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Latchesar Ionkov <[email protected]>
> > 
> > if error occurs while in v9fs_get_sb, some objects are freed twice -- once
> > in v9fs_get_sb, the second time when v9fs_kill_super is (indirectly
> > called).
>  
> Huh?  ->kill_sb() is *NOT* called when ->get_sb() fails.

I guess I wasn't clear. If v9fs ->get_sb fails after it called sget,
->get_sb calls deactivate_super, which calls ->kill_sb().

Thanks,
	Lucho
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] v9fs-get-sb-cleanup.patch
    • From: Latchesar Ionkov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] v9fs-get-sb-cleanup.patch
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] v9fs-get-sb-cleanup.patch
• Next by Date: Re: [patch] stop inotify from sending random DELETE_SELF event under load
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] v9fs-get-sb-cleanup.patch
• Next by thread: Re: readme-update-from-the-stone-age.patch added to -mm tree
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]