Re: I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel

David Masover wrote:

>
> And personally, if it was my FS, I'd stop working on fsck after it was
> able to "check".  That's what it's for.  To fix an FS, you wipe it and
> restore from backups.
>
>
Umm, this is going too far David.  Our fsck should work, and we will
give his script to Vitaly to play with and comment on.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel
    • From: Horst von Brand <[email protected]>
  • Re: I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel
    • From: Hans Reiser <[email protected]>
  • Re: I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
  • Re: I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel
    • From: David Masover <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [RFC][PATCH 2/4] build_zonelists(): abstract node_load[] operations
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/10] vfs: global namespace semaphore
• Previous by thread: Re: I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel
• Next by thread: Re: I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]