Re: [PATCH linux-2.6.13-rt14] Priority inversion bug

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> thanks - added it to my tree. I'm wondering why it never showed up in
> practice?

How do we know if it hasn't?  It wouldn't bug, you may just have a longer
latency on the higher priority process than what should be. It did happen
on my kernel, and the way I found that it did, was that I had a test in
the passing of ownership to make sure that the one that got the lock is
indeed the highest priority process. Without this check, we probably
would never know.

-- Steve

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux