Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize

Wow, too early in the morning...  Aside from other typoes

> If we can agree on that, then the exit path becomes
> 	if (atomic_dec_and_lock(&current->cpuset.refcount)) {

	if (atomic_dec_and_lock(&cs->refcount, &cs->parent->child_list)

Sorry,
Robin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize
    • From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize
    • From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize
    • From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize
    • From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize
    • From: Robin Holt <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), )
• Next by Date: Re: ctime set by truncate even if NOCMTIME requested
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]