On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 12:07:33AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> What's happening might be (and no, I haven't looked into the gcc codegenerator
> yet) as simple as too early conversion of assignment to memcpy() call, losing
> the "we don't really use the address of this sucker after initialization"
> in process.
Not quite. But failure to copy-propagate structures is a known problem.
It's on the to-do list. Hopefully the improved alias analysis to be done
for gcc 4.2 will make this task not suck.
*shrug*
r~
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), )
- Re: p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), )
- Re: p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), )
- Re: p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), )
- Re: p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), )
- Re: p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), )
- Re: p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), )
- Re: p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), )
- Re: p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), )
- Re: p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), )
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
|
|