From: Mike Habeck <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:43:29 -0500
> So is hacking the SN specific code to initialize the device's
> state to PCI_DO more attractive than keeping John Linville current
> patch? As I said, I personally see nothing wrong with John
> Linville current patch to check the actual state of the device.
I think keeping John's patch in is fine, especially if you guys
do have the longer term strategy of making pci_resource_to_bus()
work properly on this platform. Because somewhere down the line
something else will depend upon it being correct, and you'll
need to address this properly.
Actually, some PCI quirk fixups use pcibios_bus_to_resource(), but the
one's that do this are probably not relevant on ia64.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |