Re: 2.6.14-rc1 wait()/SIG_CHILD bevahiour

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The test program is buggy.  Here is one clue:

	elm3b29:~ # strace -p 30023
	Process 30023 attached - interrupt to quit
	futex(0x2aaaaaddf118, FUTEX_WAIT, 2, NULL

It's not anywhere near wait4.  It's deadlocked in the rand() call inside
rand_delay, called from sigchld_handler.  You cannot safely call rand
inside a signal handler, for exactly this reason.  The signal came during
another rand call and attempted to reenter.  If this sort of deadlock is
the failure mode of your real-world case, then it is probably an
application bug.  If this deadlock is just a mistake in your test program
here, then you'll need to give us a corrected test program to pursue
whatever real kernel issue you may have.


Thanks,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux