Re: workaround large MTU and N-order allocation failures

Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-09-18 at 17:35 +0300, Dan Aloni wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Is there currently a workaround available for handling large MTU
> > (larger than 1 page, even 2-order) in the Linux network stack?
> >
> > The problem with large MTU is external memory fragmentation in
> > the buddy system following high workload, causing alloc_skb() to
> > fail.
> >
> > I'm interested in patches for both 2.4 and 2.6 kernels.
>
> Yes there is currently a workaround. That is to keep increasing
> /proc/sys/vm/min_free_kbytes until your allocation failures stop.

How do you do it in 2.4?

--
Al
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • workaround large MTU and N-order allocation failures
    • From: Dan Aloni <[email protected]>
  • Re: workaround large MTU and N-order allocation failures
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] move tasklist walk from cfq-iosched to elevator.c
• Next by Date: Re: dell's latitude cdburner problem
• Previous by thread: Re: workaround large MTU and N-order allocation failures
• Next by thread: Re: workaround large MTU and N-order allocation failures
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]