On Sun, 2005-09-18 at 14:59 -0700, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote: > tree 1da3df4563187bae7eec7834d1fada04f8a9271b > parent 67e6b629212fa9ffb7420e8a88a41806af637e28 > author David S. Miller <[email protected]> Sat, 17 Sep 2005 06:59:20 -0700 > committer David S. Miller <[email protected]> Sat, 17 Sep 2005 06:59:20 -0700 > > [TG3]: Add AMD K8 to list of write-reorder chipsets. > > Thanks to Andy Stewart for the report and testing > debug patches from Michael Chan. shouldn't something like this move to generic code? (and in this case, probably as quirk that disables the chipset "feature" ?)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [TG3]: Add AMD K8 to list of write-reorder chipsets.
- From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
- Re: [TG3]: Add AMD K8 to list of write-reorder chipsets.
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [TG3]: Add AMD K8 to list of write-reorder chipsets.
- Prev by Date: Re: [BUG] module-init-tools
- Next by Date: Re: I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel
- Previous by thread: [RFC PATCH] pci_ids.h: cleanup: whitespace and remove unused entries
- Next by thread: Re: [TG3]: Add AMD K8 to list of write-reorder chipsets.
- Index(es):
