Re: Fork capture

• To: Al Boldi <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Fork capture
• From: Coywolf Qi Hunt <[email protected]>
• Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:55:44 +0800
• Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ePrw4Fjr62mgJL4HX6s7pDyJcX/iCXIm3ZyHctk0FY40SotktqAROnHMroicCSIbLn3FchiYXSUZFUa4yPXPs+EzgBUHMiVxP0Hv40DjRf05yMocsvP5QdR1L3RXQY+aybuTgeAyzDBRLxgJCkKeqn8HU8X7hLbeOrNpWVYWLLY=
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: [email protected]
• Sender: [email protected]

On 9/18/05, Al Boldi <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Is there a way to capture a process-fork?
> 
> Something like:
> process/kModule A monitors procs for forking, captures it and manages further
> processing.

Look at the fork_connector patch.
-- 
Coywolf Qi Hunt
http://sosdg.org/~coywolf/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Fork capture
    • From: Al Boldi <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Fork capture
    • From: Al Boldi <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: PATCH: Fix race in cpu_down (hotplug cpu)
• Next by Date: Re: PATCH: Fix race in cpu_down (hotplug cpu)
• Previous by thread: Fork capture
• Next by thread: Re: Fork capture
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]