Re: [Question] Can we release vma that include code when one process is running?

liyu@WAN wrote:

Sorry, I perhaps didn't said clearly.

As I knwon, if we remove vma from vma tree of task, the SIGSEGV must be got! but I am not removed them , I just unmapped them. and the SIGSEGV occurs some times,

not alway.

I doublt on it.

Any clearly idea?

No clear ideas, no. Are you doing the proper synchronization and
flushing required when unmapping those regions?

If you can post your unmapping code to lkml, someone might be able
to spot a bug in it.

Thanks,
Nick

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com -

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [Question] Can we release vma that include code when one process is running?
    • From: "liyu@WAN" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Question] Can we release vma that include code when one process is running?
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Question] Can we release vma that include code when one process is running?
    • From: "liyu@WAN" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/5] atomic: introduce atomic_inc_not_zero
• Next by Date: Re: Announce: Sysprof 1.0 -- a sampling, systemwide Linux profiler
• Previous by thread: Re: [Question] Can we release vma that include code when one process is running?
• Next by thread: kill useless comment in tipar.c
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]