Re: [PATCH 2/5] atomic: introduce atomic_inc_not_zero

From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 03:15:29 +0200 (CEST)

> The main problem is here that the atomic functions are used in two basic 
> situation:
> 
> 1) interrupt synchronization
> 2) multiprocessor synchronization

3) preempt synchronization
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH 2/5] atomic: introduce atomic_inc_not_zero
    • From: Russell King <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2/5] atomic: introduce atomic_inc_not_zero
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2/5] atomic: introduce atomic_inc_not_zero
    • From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/5] atomic: introduce atomic_inc_not_zero
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/5] atomic: introduce atomic_inc_not_zero
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/5] atomic: introduce atomic_inc_not_zero
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/5] atomic: introduce atomic_inc_not_zero
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]