Hi, On Sat, 17 Sep 2005, Roman Zippel wrote: > Define "using", as long as the count is different from the cpuset is > active and the possible actions on it are limited. Oops, add a "zero," after "from" to make this an understandable sentence. :) bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize
- Prev by Date: Re: R52 hdaps support?
- Next by Date: Re: R52 hdaps support?
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize
- Index(es):
