Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize

Hi,

On Sat, 17 Sep 2005, Roman Zippel wrote:

> Define "using", as long as the count is different from the cpuset is 
> active and the possible actions on it are limited.

Oops, add a "zero," after "from" to make this an understandable sentence. :)

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize
  - From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize
  - From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize
  - From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize
  - From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize
  - From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize
  - From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize
  - From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize
  - From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize
  - From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize
  - From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: R52 hdaps support?
Next by Date: Re: R52 hdaps support?
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] cpuset semaphore depth check optimize
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind]