Re: [patch] Fix epoll delayed initialization bug ...

[Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>]

Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> wrote:
>
> diff -Nru linux-2.6.13.vanilla/fs/eventpoll.c linux-2.6.13/fs/eventpoll.c
>  --- linux-2.6.13.vanilla/fs/eventpoll.c	2005-09-16 15:20:46.000000000 -0700
>  +++ linux-2.6.13/fs/eventpoll.c	2005-09-16 15:21:08.000000000 -0700
>  @@ -231,8 +231,9 @@
> 
>    static void ep_poll_safewake_init(struct poll_safewake *psw);
>    static void ep_poll_safewake(struct poll_safewake *psw, wait_queue_head_t *wq);
>  -static int ep_getfd(int *efd, struct inode **einode, struct file **efile);
>  -static int ep_file_init(struct file *file);
>  +static int ep_getfd(int *efd, struct inode **einode, struct file **efile,
>  +		    struct eventpoll *ep);
>  +static int ep_alloc(struct eventpoll **pep);

Sigh.  Space-stuffing strikes again.  Please resend as an attachment.

The number of whitespace-buggered patches which are coming in is just
getting out of control lately.

Even `patch -l' tossed four rejects, so there may be something else wrong
in this one.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/