Hi Andrea,
> BTW, I tested dbench (not after a fresh mke2fs so there might be
> minor fragmentation variations) and it doesn't seem affected by it (it's
> in the noise range) and I take it as a good thing. dbench keeps looking
> weird, if you notice the lower bandwidth of 273 completed in 12m13s
> while the higher bandwidth of 291 completed in 12m15s... perhaps it
> prints the best bandwith of the passes and it's not an average.
>From memory, if you are using a recent version of dbench it runs for a
constant amount of time. The old version ran a constant number of
operations (and so runtimes varied based on your performance).
Anton
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |