On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:03:16 -0700 (PDT)
"David S. Miller" <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 11:38:58 -0700
>
> > It looks like the following would fix hippi to not have to put
> > fields in sk_buff. The ifield looks appears to to be additional
> > header information that is being passed in the skb but could just
> > be put in the header.
>
> Stephen this patch is against 2.6.13 or something. We already
> put this thing into a SKB control block for 2.6.14-rc1. Do you
> want to keep things that way or update your patch for 2.6.14-rc1?
Sorry, I was cleaning up the old unfinished work pile. The new version
(using header) is better than the cb version because it is cleaner
and doesn't have the nasty error handling issues of reallocating
header in the transmit routine.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |