Hi.
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 16:37, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > Here's prototype code for swsusp3. It seems to work for me, but don't
> > > try it... yet. Code is very ugly at places, sorry, I know and will fix
> > > it. This is just proof that it can be done, and that it can be done
> > > without excessive ammount of code.
> >
> > No comments on the code sorry. Instead I want to ask, could you please
> > find a different name? swsusp3 is going to make people think that it's
> > Suspend2 redesigned. Since there hasn't been a swsusp2 (so far as I
> > know), how about using that name instead? At least then we'll clearly
> > differentiate the two implementations and you won't confuse/irritate
> > users.
>
> swsusp2 can't be used, it is already "taken" by suspend2 (25000 hits
> on google). I was actually hoping that you would release suspend4
> (using swsusp3 infrastructure) :-).
You could reclaim it. There are 10 times as many hits (239,000) for
suspend2, and I've never wanted it to be called swsusp2 anyway :). As
for suspend4, at the moment, I'm not planning on ever progressing beyond
2.x.
> I guess I could call it "uswsusp".
u as in micro?
Regards,
Nigel
> Pavel
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |