On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 19:09 -0700, Mike Bell wrote:
> Nope, unfortunately. If you read my initial response I was quite
> thrilled. But once I realized the limitations of ndevfs I changed my
> tone. The devfs hooks are still required to provide appropriate names,
> and it is these I'm most interested in saving.
If you can survive without modernism, why can't you survive without
devfs? Why do you need it?
Robert Love
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |