Re: [PATCH 2.6.13.1] Patch for invisible threads

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bill Davidsen wrote:

Let me say that this solution, and any other which loops through all threads of a task, isn't going to scale well. I don't have a magic O(1) solution, if it were easy someone would have done that instead of the while loop, just noting that a clever solution would be a win on servers.

Bill,

We will only have to go through the while loop in rare cases where main thread has done pthread_exit() before other threads (and hence it's task->fs is null). Also, even in most such cases, the very first iteration through the while loop will get us the 'fs' pointer, so we won't have to loop through all threads. So I think this won't have scalability problem. Am I right?

Thanks,
Sripathi.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux