Re: [PATCH] Remove drivers/parport/parport_arc.c

On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 22:42 +0100, Ian Molton wrote:
> Well unless the parport stuff changed to support ports where one cant 
> read the data latch, its still needed. 

I'm not sure I understand what you mean by that.  Can you explain what
sort of potential changes to the "parport stuff" you were thinking of?

p.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] Remove drivers/parport/parport_arc.c
  - From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Remove drivers/parport/parport_arc.c
  - From: Russell King <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Remove drivers/parport/parport_arc.c
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Remove drivers/parport/parport_arc.c
  - From: Ian Molton <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] nfs client, kernel 2.4.31: readlink result overflow
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 5/5] remove HAVE_ARCH_CMPXCHG
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Remove drivers/parport/parport_arc.c
Next by thread: [PATCH 0/2][FAT] miss-sync issues on sync mount
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind]