On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 06:34:04PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 02:17:52PM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 11:16:36PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> >
> > Ted,
> >
> > I am sending two patches here.
> >
> > First is dentry_stats patch which collects some dcache statistics
> > and puts it into /proc/meminfo. This patch provides information
> > about how dentries are distributed in dcache slab pages, how many
> > free and in use dentries are present in dentry_unused lru list and
> > how prune_dcache() performs with respect to freeing the requested
> > number of dentries.
>
> Hi Bharata,
>
> +void get_dstat_info(void)
> +{
> + struct dentry *dentry;
> +
> + lru_dentry_stat.nr_total = lru_dentry_stat.nr_inuse = 0;
> + lru_dentry_stat.nr_ref = lru_dentry_stat.nr_free = 0;
> +
> + spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
> + list_for_each_entry(dentry, &dentry_unused, d_lru) {
> + if (atomic_read(&dentry->d_count))
> + lru_dentry_stat.nr_inuse++;
>
> Dentries on dentry_unused list with d_count positive? Is that possible
> at all? As far as my limited understanding goes, only dentries with zero
> count can be part of the dentry_unused list.
That changed during the lock-free dcache implementation during
2.5. If we strictly update the lru list, we will have to acquire
the dcache_lock in __d_lookup() on a successful lookup. So we
did lazy-lru, leave the dentries with non-zero refcounts
and clean them up later when we acquire dcache_lock for other
purposes.
Thanks
Dipankar
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |