Re: [RFC] Splitting out kernel<=>userspace ABI headers

linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote:

No No. The solution is to do it right. If the standard says that
the header file can't include a header file defining the types used
within that header file (and I don't think the "standard" says that
at all), then the correct solution is to include the correct header file
in the user program. It is truly just that simple.

Dear Wrongbot,

No, it's not that simple.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [RFC] Splitting out kernel<=>userspace ABI headers
    • From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] Splitting out kernel<=>userspace ABI headers
    • From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] Splitting out kernel<=>userspace ABI headers
    • From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] Splitting out kernel<=>userspace ABI headers
    • From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] Splitting out kernel<=>userspace ABI headers
    • From: "linux-os \(Dick Johnson\)" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: PCI driver
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH]: Brown paper bag in fs/file.c?
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] Splitting out kernel<=>userspace ABI headers
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC] Splitting out kernel<=>userspace ABI headers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]