As I do periodically, I checked to see how far out of sync
compat_do_execve() has gotten from do_execve(). And as usual there
was some missing stuff in the former. Perhaps we need some tighter
consolidation of these two routines to make this less likely to happen
in the future.
Anyways, on the success path of compat_do_execve() we forget
to call acct_update_integrals() and update_mem_hiwater(), as
is done in do_execve().
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
diff --git a/fs/compat.c b/fs/compat.c
--- a/fs/compat.c
+++ b/fs/compat.c
@@ -44,6 +44,8 @@
#include <linux/nfsd/syscall.h>
#include <linux/personality.h>
#include <linux/rwsem.h>
+#include <linux/acct.h>
+#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <net/sock.h> /* siocdevprivate_ioctl */
@@ -1487,6 +1489,8 @@ int compat_do_execve(char * filename,
/* execve success */
security_bprm_free(bprm);
+ acct_update_integrals(current);
+ update_mem_hiwater(current);
kfree(bprm);
return retval;
}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
|
|