On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 09:50:20AM -0500, Roger Heflin wrote: > I guess I see 5 choices: 6. > #1: > Use lib for whatever the standard os/arch size is. > > Use lib32 for the non-standard size. And what happens for machines with more than one 32 and one 64bit ABI? > #2: > Continue the current mess. > > #3: > Use both lib32 and lib64 and maybe put a link from lib to the > default one, probably lib64. > > #4: > Use both lib32 and lib64 and don't put a link. > > #5: > Designate the bit size in the name of the lib, ie libc.so64 or > libc.so32 or something similar and put them all in the same > directory and let the lib loading code take care of finding the > correct size. #6: Use /lib/$arch-$os or similar and forgot about /lib/*.so. Bastian -- Beam me up, Scotty! It ate my phaser!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- References:
- Re: Pure 64 bootloaders
- From: Harald Dunkel <[email protected]>
- RE: Pure 64 bootloaders
- From: "Roger Heflin" <[email protected]>
- Re: Pure 64 bootloaders
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.13.1] Patch for invisible threads
- Next by Date: Re: "Read my lips: no more merges" - aka Linux 2.6.14-rc1
- Previous by thread: RE: Pure 64 bootloaders
- Next by thread: Re: Pure 64 bootloaders
- Index(es):