On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > >
> > > The one that puzzles me greatly isn't listed there: 'G'
> >
> > I guess it means GPL.
> >
> > It's just the opposite of 'P', whereas all of the others
> > have opposites of ' '.
>
> I guess the same, but doesn't it seem a strange kind of taint?
<tainted> has already been found to be non-0.
Looks like someone decided to reinforce the GPL-ness of
all modules at that point and that some other tainted flag(s)
should be set.
--
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
| |
 |