On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 04:42 +0000, carmen wrote: > > > thats with 'Complete Preemption (Real-Time)' . the 'Preemptible Kernel (Low-Latency Desktop)' option fails to compile: > > > > > > In file included from arch/x86_64/kernel/mce.c:17: > > > include/linux/fs.h: In function `lock_super': > > > include/linux/fs.h:855: warning: implicit declaration of function `down' > > > include/linux/fs.h: In function `unlock_super': > > > include/linux/fs.h:861: warning: implicit declaration of function `up' > > > arch/x86_64/kernel/mce.c:396: error: `mce_read_sem' undeclared (first use in this function) > > > Please provide your kernel .config. > > ..attached. MCE seems impossible to disable..although maybe this is dependent on some other checkbox somewhere else. is there an option somewhere for writing a dump to disk (maybe in /boot) on kernel panic? > > the nature of the auto-reboot reminds me of kernels compiled for ppc G5 and running on G3, or PIII running on a P60mhz.. > > carmen.. Don't trim CC lists - always use Reply-To-All when answering list messages. I have restored Ingo and LKML to the cc: list. Lee
Attachment:
config.bz2
Description: application/bzip
- References:
- Re: [linux-audio-user] is RT-Preempt functional on x86-64?
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: [linux-audio-user] is RT-Preempt functional on x86-64?
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.13 14/14] sas-class: SCSI Host glue
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.13 14/14] sas-class: SCSI Host glue
- Previous by thread: Re: [linux-audio-user] is RT-Preempt functional on x86-64?
- Next by thread: RE: [PATCH 10/12] kbuild: cris use generic asm-offsets.h support
- Index(es):
