Re: [PATCH] i386 CFI annotations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 12:49:14AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 09:04:12AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > But truly I think the processor-specific pieces of Dwarf's
> > frame unwind spec should provide numbering for the complete set of
> > registers.
> 
> Except there is no standards body for this.  So *someone* will
> have to make it up.
> 
> Make it up and put it in gas and gdb: that will make it a defacto standard.

Agreed.  If it makes you feel better, we could ask the DWARF committee to
maintain a repository of processor-specific documents.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux