On Sun, 2005-09-11 at 07:02 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 12:20:06AM -0700, David Lang wrote: > > >I'll bite - what distros are shipping a kernel 2.6.10 or later and still > > >using devfs? > > > > > I'll admit I don't keep track of the distros and what kernels and features > > they are useing. I think I've heard people mention gentoo, but I > > haven't verified this. > Why do people always remember us as using devfs, instead of being one of the first distro's supporting it (if not the first) ? :( I already added support for udev to the initscripts back in Sep 2003, and added the udev-0.2 package to the tree in Oct 2003. > Nope, not Gentoo --- Greg KH fixed gentoo a while ago. :-) > Not entirely true, but he did start to maintain the udev package around udev-022. -- Martin Schlemmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- References:
- [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.13
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.13
- From: David Lang <[email protected]>
- Re: [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.13
- From: [email protected]
- Re: [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.13
- From: David Lang <[email protected]>
- Re: [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.13
- From: "Theodore Ts'o" <[email protected]>
- [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.13
- Prev by Date: Re: [discuss] [1/3] Add 4GB DMA32 zone
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC][MEGAPATCH] Change __ASSEMBLY__ to __ASSEMBLER__ (defined by GCC from 2.95 to current CVS)
- Previous by thread: Re: [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.13
- Next by thread: Re: [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.13
- Index(es):
