Re: read-from-all-disks support for RAID1?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday September 12, [email protected] wrote:
> > No, I don't think so.  The overhead would be substantial, so people
> > would be very unlikely to use it.
> 
> There are situations where data integrity is far more important than speed.
> On AIX I usually use the Mirror Write Consistency and Write Verify
> options on my mirrored volumes that store data where integrity is more
> important than speed.
> I guess something like those options would also satisfy Lennert's
> needs, but I don't know if it's currently possible with the Linux LVM
> or elsewhere.
> 
> You can read a bit about the MWC and WV options in AIX at :
> http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/pseries/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.aix.doc/aixbman/prftungd/diskperf2.htm

Thanks for the link.

If I understand the (fairly brief) descriptions correctly:
 Passive mirror-write-constancy has always been part of md/raid1
 Active mirror-write-constancy is equivalent to the new
   bitmap-write-intent support.
 WV  means read-after-write which we don't do, but might be useful.

 However, I'm not 100% certain that WV would really be useful.  Modern
 drives will almost certainly return a read-after-write request out of
 the drive's cache rather than going to the media.  We would need some
 way to tell the drive to ignore the cache for this read.  I suspect
 this is possible, but might not be trivial...
 
NeilBrown

 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux