hi,
I've been having bad I/O performance with this SATA controller card
(Highpoint Rocket RAID 1520). Kernel version is 2.6.11.12.
First I used it with 2 samsung 80G P.ATA drives (with adapters) and it
was not so good... about 15Mb/s uncached throughput for each disk. Now
I've got 2 new Maxtor 200G native SATA drives attached and... the numbers
didn't change.
The old samsung drives now attached to a promise Ultra133 TX2 P.ATA
controller are quite faster than before and smoke the SATA drives...
weird.
What follows are some (modified) snips of dmesg:
hde: SAMSUNG SP0802N, ATA DISK drive
hde: max request size: 1024KiB
hde: 156368016 sectors (80060 MB) w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=16383/255/63,
UDMA(100) DISK drive
hdg: [same as hde]
hdi: Maxtor 6B200M0, ATA DISK drive
hdi: max request size: 1024KiB
hdi: 398297088 sectors (203928 MB) w/8192KiB Cache, CHS=24792/255/63,
UDMA(33)
hdk: [same as hdi]
PDC20269: IDE controller at PCI slot 0000:00:03.0
ide2: BM-DMA at 0xb000-0xb007, BIOS settings: hde:pio, hdf:pio
ide3: BM-DMA at 0xb008-0xb00f, BIOS settings: hdg:pio, hdh:pio
HPT372A: IDE controller at PCI slot 0000:01:02.0
ide4: BM-DMA at 0x8400-0x8407, BIOS settings: hdi:DMA, hdj:pio
ide5: BM-DMA at 0x8408-0x840f, BIOS settings: hdk:DMA, hdl:pio
Now, hdparm -tT tests show what I mean (results are median (not average,
the middle value) of 3 successive runs):
/dev/hde:
Timing cached reads: 728 MB in 2.01 seconds = 362.97 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 158 MB in 3.02 seconds = 52.27 MB/sec
/dev/hdi:
Timing cached reads: 772 MB in 2.00 seconds = 385.67 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 42 MB in 3.04 seconds = 13.80 MB/sec
One could think: well, your samsung drives got faster (~4x) and your
Maxtor drives are faulty. Not quite. If I re-run the tests plugging the
Maxtors via SATA-P.ATA adapters into the promise card, they score about
63Mb/s each for "Timing buffered disk reads" (no snip for that, just
believe me).
Is there anyone with an explanation or should I assume the Highpoint
SATA controller card... sucks. What could be a better replacement? Are
Promises SATA150 TX4 any good (on linux, of course)? or maybe SATA300 TX4?
best regards,
pedro venda.
--
Pedro João Lopes Venda
pjvenda < at > arrakis dhis org
http://arrakis.dhis.org
Attachment:
pgpzhrwgQps8J.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Prev by Date: Re: What's up with the GIT archive on www.kernel.org?
- Next by Date: Re: What's up with the GIT archive on www.kernel.org?
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] Remove trailing whitespace in wbsd
- Next by thread: Re: Bad I/O performance Highpoint Rocket 1520 SATA controller (kernel 2.6.11.12)
- Index(es):
