hi, I've been having bad I/O performance with this SATA controller card (Highpoint Rocket RAID 1520). Kernel version is 2.6.11.12. First I used it with 2 samsung 80G P.ATA drives (with adapters) and it was not so good... about 15Mb/s uncached throughput for each disk. Now I've got 2 new Maxtor 200G native SATA drives attached and... the numbers didn't change. The old samsung drives now attached to a promise Ultra133 TX2 P.ATA controller are quite faster than before and smoke the SATA drives... weird. What follows are some (modified) snips of dmesg: hde: SAMSUNG SP0802N, ATA DISK drive hde: max request size: 1024KiB hde: 156368016 sectors (80060 MB) w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=16383/255/63, UDMA(100) DISK drive hdg: [same as hde] hdi: Maxtor 6B200M0, ATA DISK drive hdi: max request size: 1024KiB hdi: 398297088 sectors (203928 MB) w/8192KiB Cache, CHS=24792/255/63, UDMA(33) hdk: [same as hdi] PDC20269: IDE controller at PCI slot 0000:00:03.0 ide2: BM-DMA at 0xb000-0xb007, BIOS settings: hde:pio, hdf:pio ide3: BM-DMA at 0xb008-0xb00f, BIOS settings: hdg:pio, hdh:pio HPT372A: IDE controller at PCI slot 0000:01:02.0 ide4: BM-DMA at 0x8400-0x8407, BIOS settings: hdi:DMA, hdj:pio ide5: BM-DMA at 0x8408-0x840f, BIOS settings: hdk:DMA, hdl:pio Now, hdparm -tT tests show what I mean (results are median (not average, the middle value) of 3 successive runs): /dev/hde: Timing cached reads: 728 MB in 2.01 seconds = 362.97 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 158 MB in 3.02 seconds = 52.27 MB/sec /dev/hdi: Timing cached reads: 772 MB in 2.00 seconds = 385.67 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 42 MB in 3.04 seconds = 13.80 MB/sec One could think: well, your samsung drives got faster (~4x) and your Maxtor drives are faulty. Not quite. If I re-run the tests plugging the Maxtors via SATA-P.ATA adapters into the promise card, they score about 63Mb/s each for "Timing buffered disk reads" (no snip for that, just believe me). Is there anyone with an explanation or should I assume the Highpoint SATA controller card... sucks. What could be a better replacement? Are Promises SATA150 TX4 any good (on linux, of course)? or maybe SATA300 TX4? best regards, pedro venda. -- Pedro João Lopes Venda pjvenda < at > arrakis dhis org http://arrakis.dhis.org
Attachment:
pgpzhrwgQps8J.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Prev by Date: Re: What's up with the GIT archive on www.kernel.org?
- Next by Date: Re: What's up with the GIT archive on www.kernel.org?
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] Remove trailing whitespace in wbsd
- Next by thread: Re: Bad I/O performance Highpoint Rocket 1520 SATA controller (kernel 2.6.11.12)
- Index(es):