Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005, Miguel wrote:
After applying this patch I don't see anything new so I have added the
same WARN_ON in pci_write_config_byte and pci_write_config_word and now
dmesg shows this:
Thanks. Nobody should ever do a byte write to that offset, but clearly
something does.
And yes, that's what I missed even though I quoted it from the hpt366
driver (heh, and nobody else noticed either):
/* FIXME: Not portable */
if (dev->resource[PCI_ROM_RESOURCE].start)
pci_write_config_byte(dev, PCI_ROM_ADDRESS,
dev->resource[PCI_ROM_RESOURCE].start | PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_ENABLE);
I wonder how long that has been like that.
Change the pci_write_config_byte() into a pci_write_config_dword(), and I
bet it works.
However, I _also_ suspect it works if you remove those lines entirely. I
don't see why it tries to enable the ROM in the first place - it doesn't
seem to be _using_ it.
I can't figure out what's going on in hpt driver, either. Just checked
in 2.2 (not present) and 2.4 (same write-byte code).
Maybe Alan or Bart has details?
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
|
|